Space-based solar power

Also known as SBSP, Space solar power, Orbital solar power

Space-based solar power would collect sunlight with large structures in orbit and beam the energy to Earth as microwaves or laser light. A small in-orbit wireless power test has been demonstrated, but no complete orbital power system has yet delivered electricity to a grid.

Research and prototypesDemonstratedReviewed 21 Oct 2026
AI illustration · Illustrative scene, not a photograph of the specific device or experiment.

In plain language

Space-based solar power is the idea of building very large solar collectors in orbit, where sunlight can be collected for longer than on the ground. The collected energy would be turned into a radio beam or a laser and aimed at a receiver on Earth, which would turn it back into electricity.

The idea is simple to state but hard to build. The structures would need to be enormous, the beam would need to be aimed very precisely, and the system would need to compete on cost with ground solar farms, wind and batteries. In 2023 a small Caltech experiment sent microwave power to receivers about 30 centimetres away, in orbit. That showed the basic link can work in space, but it was far short of a power station.

Technical explanation

A complete system has four stages. Photovoltaic cells on a large collector turn sunlight into electricity. Power electronics drive a phased microwave array or a laser transmitter, and the array changes the timing of many small emitters so the combined beam can be steered without moving the whole structure. A ground rectenna converts the microwave beam back into electricity. The system also needs assembly, station-keeping, fault response, repair and end-of-life disposal. Losses occur at every stage, so performance has to be measured across the whole chain, from sunlight at the collector to net electricity at the grid connection.

The 2023 Caltech demonstrator, SSPD-1, carried three experiments: DOLCE, a deployable structure; ALBA, a set of solar cell types; and MAPLE, a flexible array of microwave transmitters. In orbit, MAPLE directed energy to two receiver arrays about 30 centimetres away, which converted it to direct current and lit LEDs. Caltech also reported a signal detected on a rooftop on Earth, but its announcement does not report useful grid power. After deliberate stress testing late in the mission, MAPLE's total transmitted power fell, and lab tests linked this to degraded transmitter elements and electrical-thermal interactions.

NASA's 2024 lifecycle assessment modelled two reference designs, each normalised to 2 GW to the grid from 2050, assembled in geostationary orbit. In its baseline, launch and manufacturing dominate cost and emissions. The heliostat-swarm design produced power for 99% of the year in the model, and the planar-array design for 60%, because it could reposition less. The results depend heavily on assumptions about launch prices, hardware lifetime and manufacturing, so they should be read as scenarios rather than forecasts.

What the evidence says

Each statement is typed by the strength of its evidence and linked to the source that supports it.

Demonstrated Shown in a published experiment, test or shipping product.

Caltech's Space Solar Power Demonstrator 1 (SSPD-1) launched on 3 January 2023 as a hosted experiment and stopped communicating with Earth on 11 November 2023.

Sources: [2] · Mission summary

In orbit, the MAPLE payload's microwave transmitters directed energy to two receiver arrays about 30 centimetres away, which converted it to direct current and lit LEDs.

Sources: [1] · Announcement body

After deliberate stress testing late in the mission, MAPLE's total transmitted power fell, and lab tests linked this to degraded transmitter elements and electrical-thermal interactions.

Sources: [2] · MAPLE results

Reported, unverified Stated by a company or team but not independently confirmed.

Caltech reports that a receiver on a Caltech building roof in Pasadena detected MAPLE's signal from orbit on 22 May 2023 at the expected time and frequency. The announcement does not report useful grid electricity.

Sources: [1] · Announcement body · medium confidence

A July 2023 Thales Alenia Space press release says ESA's SOLARIS study should let Europe make an informed decision by 2025 on whether to start a development programme. The outcome of that decision is not confirmed in the sources checked for this profile.

Sources: [5] · Press release body · medium confidence

Proposed A design or plan that has not yet been built or tested.

NASA's 2024 baseline models two first-of-a-kind 2 GW systems delivering power from 2050, with lifecycle costs of US$0.61/kWh and US$1.59/kWh, against US$0.02 to 0.05/kWh for terrestrial alternatives. Launch is 71% and 77% of those costs, and the designs need 2,321 and 3,960 launches.

Sources: [3] · Lifecycle cost findings

NASA's sensitivity case, which combines several cost and capability improvements beyond the baseline assumptions, lowers the modelled cost to US$0.03/kWh and US$0.08/kWh. NASA presents these as modelled outcomes, not as demonstrated results.

Sources: [3] · Cost competitiveness section · medium confidence

NASA's baseline lifecycle emissions are 26 gCO2e/kWh for the heliostat-swarm design and 40 gCO2e/kWh for the planar-array design. NASA notes that these figures do not include upper-atmosphere effects of launch emissions, which are still under study.

Sources: [3] · Emissions findings

A 2025 Caltech paper in Joule proposes a distributed geostationary architecture and estimates 9.4 cents per kWh for a 10 GHz system after 10 years of development and scaling. The estimate is model-dependent and is not a measured result.

Sources: [4] · Abstract · medium confidence

Limitations and open problems

  • The only in-space power link so far is a small hosted test with receivers about 30 centimetres away. The published account gives no power levels or end-to-end energy balance, and it did not deliver grid electricity.
  • NASA's cost and emissions figures are scenario outputs for first-of-a-kind systems in 2050. They are not a forecast, and they depend on assumed launch prices, hardware lifetimes and manufacturing learning curves.
  • Launch drives most of the modelled cost and emissions. NASA's baseline needed 2,321 and 3,960 launches, and its emissions figures do not include upper-atmosphere effects of launch emissions, which are still under study.
  • Lightweight arrays face deployment, radiation, thermal cycling and debris risks. SSPD-1 had a snagged deployment and a later drop in transmitted power.
  • The sources reviewed do not report tests of beam containment, automatic shutdown, exposure limits or spectrum coordination at relevant power and scale.
  • Microwave and laser designs face different constraints, such as atmospheric absorption and eye safety for lasers, and should be assessed separately.

Possible future uses

Speculative

Ideas, not predictions. None of these has been demonstrated.

  • Power beamed to remote sites or islands where building transmission lines is costly.
  • Energy supply for lunar or other space infrastructure, where delivering energy from Earth is already expensive.
  • Emergency power beamed to a temporary receiver after a disaster.

Timeline

  1. 3 Jan 2023Caltech's Space Solar Power Demonstrator 1 (SSPD-1) launches as a hosted experiment carrying the DOLCE, ALBA and MAPLE payloads. Sources: [2]
  2. 22 May 2023A receiver on a Caltech building roof detects the MAPLE signal from orbit, as reported by Caltech. Sources: [1]
  3. 1 Jun 2023Caltech announces that MAPLE transmitted power in orbit to receivers about 30 centimetres away. Sources: [1]
  4. 11 Nov 2023SSPD-1 stops communicating with Earth, ending the mission. Sources: [2]
  5. 11 Jan 2024NASA's Office of Technology, Policy and Strategy publishes a lifecycle assessment of two reference space-based solar power designs. Sources: [3]
  6. 13 May 2025A Caltech-led team publishes online a distributed space solar power architecture and technoeconomic analysis in Joule. Sources: [4]

Futures this could help bring about

Glossary

Rectenna
A rectifying antenna that converts received microwave energy into direct current electricity.
Phased array
A set of emitters whose timing is adjusted so that their combined beam can be steered electronically.
Geostationary orbit
An orbit above the equator in which a satellite keeps pace with Earth's rotation and stays over roughly the same longitude.
Levelised cost of energy
The average cost of each unit of electricity over a plant's lifetime, including build, operation and disposal costs.

Sources

  1. university press release
    In a First, Caltech's Space Solar Power Demonstrator Wirelessly Transmits Power in Space
    California Institute of Technology, 1 Jun 2023. Accessed 21 Oct 2026.
  2. university press release
    Space Solar Power Project Ends First In-Space Mission with Successes and Lessons
    California Institute of Technology, 16 Jan 2024. Accessed 21 Oct 2026.
  3. government report
    Space Based Solar Power
    Erica Rodgers, Ellen Gertsen, Jordan Sotudeh et al.. NASA Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy, 11 Jan 2024. Accessed 21 Oct 2026.
  4. peer reviewed paper
    Space solar power generation: A viable system proposal and technoeconomic analysis
    Oren S. Mizrahi, Phillip Jahelka, Eleftherios Gdoutos et al.. Joule, 13 May 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2025.101928. Accessed 21 Oct 2026.
  5. company announcement
    ESA chooses Thales Alenia Space for SOLARIS feasibility study
    Thales Alenia Space, 24 Jul 2023. Accessed 21 Oct 2026.

Revision history

3 changes since this profile was created.

Changes on 21 Oct 2026
Published on owner instruction (content loop iteration 3)9518996
Sources and claims re-checked against originalsfbb434c
Initial profile drafted from Codex research note and primary sources0eba374

What it took to get here

The inventions this technology was built on, oldest foundations at the top. Lines show what each one required.

Built on: Space-based solar power Unlocked Being researched Locked